Thursday, March 14, 2019
Essay --
In 2002, the Lower Manhattan Development sess (LMDC) and the New York and New Jersey Port Authority held a collaborative planning event organized by America Speaks regarding the future tense phylogeny of the World Trade Center site after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The LMDC and Port Authority initially created six congruent plans regarding the reconstruction of the site. The LMDC saw the mandate they had to follow in reconstructing the tower to be broad. LMDC thus inform that it would set up eight advisory councils to represent key constituenciesfamilies residents counterweightaurants, retailers, and teensy-weensy businesses arts, education and tourism financial services firms professional firms commuters and transportation and development. (Rosegrant P.2 2002) The LMDC had do plans that would involve devising the site into a mixed area of commercial-grade and residential. The Port Authority likewise desired to stick to the original layout of the anterior World Trade Ce nter structure. They wanted to keep the space strictly for commercial and office space purposes. (Rosegrant 2002)Unable to come to an agreement on how the site should be engrossd, it was contumacious to try and reach a wider demographic in regards to creating a blueprint for the reconstruction of the site. The Port Authority and the LMDC decided to accept a proposal from America Speaks on organizing a collaborative process that will bring all of the various stakeholders together. To discuss the future of the World Trade Center site. America Speaks collaborative event brought together over 5,000 participants. 4,500 of whom were of the general public representative of the various demographics that resided within the region. The rest being composed of government and civic leade... ...c mobilization and decision making embodies the message.When programmeing a collaborative process I might call for done certain things differently, despite its flaws the collaborative process prove d to be successful. This success is owed to being inclusive through the formatting of the meeting. Innovative use of online and offline space. Allowing participants during the initial meeting define what they would want in a design plan of the space to be reconstructed. This format of collaborative planning was sensibly new and it explains why participants were non confident that their input will not be considered in the decision making. While technology did play a prominent role the management of the process was also depended on the persona of table facilitators, scribes and the theme team. America Speaks was able to successfully organize and choke this collaborative process.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.